The Differences In The Quality Of Mixed Material Radiation Aprons At Dr. Moewardi Hospital With A Review Of Attenuation Coefficient Analysis

Authors

  • Alviana Hapsari Purbarani Radiology Installation of Dr. Moewardi Hospital
  • Umi Umaimah Radiology Installation of Dr. Moewardi Hospital
  • Firman Eka Prasetya Radiology Installation of Dr. Moewardi Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ibehs.vol14iss1pp73-79

Keywords:

Apron Radiation, Attenuation Coefficient, Radiation safety

Abstract

Introduction
Radiation aprons are essential protective equipment in radiology, and the Regulation of the Head of BAPETEN No. 4 of 2020 requires aprons in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology units to provide protection equivalent to 0.25 mmPb, 0.35 mmPb, or 0.5 mmPb. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of mixed-material radiation aprons at Dr. Moewardi Hospital by analyzing their attenuation coefficients.

Methods
This study assessed several apron brands available in the Radiology Installation and Cathlab Unit. Measurements were performed using a GE Proteus X-ray machine and a Raysafe X-ray Multimeter Detector. The X-ray parameters were set at 100 kV, 10 mAs, 100 cm tube-to-detector distance, and a 5 × 5 cm irradiation field, with variations in apron thickness. The reference attenuation coefficient of Pb under the same parameters was calculated as 6.32 mm⁻¹. Apron brands tested included Primax 0.35 mmPb, ProteX 0.5 mmPb, Infab 0.25 mmPb, Lead X 0.25 mmPb, Rayshield 0.25 mmPb, Xenolite 0.35 mmPb, and Trucomfii 0.5 mmPb.

Results

The attenuation coefficients obtained were 4.67 mm⁻¹, 4.49 mm⁻¹, 4.476 mm⁻¹, 3.94 mm⁻¹, 3.04 mm⁻¹, 2.63 mm⁻¹, and 2.22 mm⁻¹, respectively. The highest coefficient was observed in the Lead X 0.25 mmPb apron. All apron attenuation coefficients were lower than the Pb reference value.

Conclusion
All mixed-material aprons evaluated demonstrated lower attenuation coefficients compared with pure Pb under identical exposure conditions. These findings indicate variability in protective performance across brands, highlighting the need for routine quality assessment to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

References

Atika Rahmawati. (2009). Pengkajian koefisien atenuasi massa material pada proses hamburan compton dengan menggunakan simulasi yang berbasis bahasa pemrograman delphi 7.0.

Eri Hiswara. (2015). Buku Pintar Proteksi dan Keselamatan Radiasi di Rumah Sakit. In Buku Pintar Proteksi dan Keselamatan Radiasi di Rumah Sakit. https://doi.org/10.55981/brin.579

Badan Pengawas Tenaga Nuklir. (2020). Peraturan Badan Pengawas Tenaga Nuklir No 4 Tahun 2020 tentang Keselamatan Radiasi pada Penggunaan Pesawat Sinar-X dalam Radiologi Diagnostik dan Intervensional.

König, A. M., Verbe Zoum, J., Fiebich, M., Abissi, P. W., & Mahnken, A. H. (2023). Comparison of the radiation protection effect of different radiation protection aprons made of different materials. European Journal of Radiology, 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110862

Downloads

Published

30-11-2025

How to Cite

Alviana Hapsari Purbarani, Umaimah, U., & Eka Prasetya, F. (2025). The Differences In The Quality Of Mixed Material Radiation Aprons At Dr. Moewardi Hospital With A Review Of Attenuation Coefficient Analysis. Indonesian Basic and Experimental Health Sciences, 14(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.11594/ibehs.vol14iss1pp73-79

Issue

Section

Articles